Best Deadline Checker: Arbitration, Section 34, Cheque Bounce and More Lawyer

In business disputes, missing a deadline can end a strong case. A Section 34 challenge filed a day after the outer limit cannot be heard, however good the grounds. A cheque bounce complaint filed late may be dismissed. A money claim filed after three years may be time-barred unless the debtor acknowledged the debt in writing. This page gives you a quick way to estimate the usual last date for common steps, based on the date that starts the clock.

Choose the step, enter the starting date, and the checker shows the usual deadline, with notes on how it is counted. It is an estimate. Real deadlines depend on facts, such as when a document was actually received, time excluded for obtaining certified copies, court vacations, and acknowledgments that restart limitation. Use it to see how much time you have, and take advice well before the date.

If the checker shows that you are close to, or past, a deadline, contact a lawyer immediately. Some deadlines can be extended for sufficient cause; others cannot.

Use this checker if

Check a deadline

Common deadlines at a glance

How limitation is counted

Under the Limitation Act, 1963 and the General Clauses Act, the day from which the period is to be counted is excluded, so a period of 30 days from 1 March ends on 31 March. Periods stated in months are calendar months, so three months from 15 January ends on 15 April. Under Section 4 of the Limitation Act, if the period expires on a day when the court is closed, the filing may be made on the day the court reopens. Section 12 excludes the time needed to obtain a certified copy of a decree or order for appeals, if applied for in time.

For Section 34 challenges, the Supreme Court in Popular Construction (2001) held that Section 5 of the Limitation Act does not apply, so the court cannot extend time beyond the extra 30 days in the proviso to Section 34(3). In Bhimashankar Sahakari Sakkare Karkhane v Walchandnagar Industries (2023), the Court held that the benefit of Section 4 for court holidays applies to the three-month period, not to the additional 30 days. Treat the Section 34 deadline as absolute.

When the clock starts: receipt and service

Many deadlines run from the date a party received a document, not the date the document was made. For a Section 34 challenge, time runs from the date the party received a signed copy of the award, delivered under Section 31(5). For a cheque bounce complaint, the 15 days run from the date the drawer received the notice, which may be presumed from proper dispatch to the correct address. For a SARFAESI objection, the 60 days run from receipt of the notice.

Keep evidence of the date of receipt: courier and postal tracking, e-mail records, and acknowledgments. Where receipt is disputed, the deadline may be disputed too, and the safer course is to act on the earliest possible date.

Acknowledgments and part payments

For money claims, Section 18 of the Limitation Act provides that a written acknowledgment of liability, signed by the debtor before the limitation period expires, starts a fresh period from the date of the acknowledgment. Section 19 provides the same for part payments made before expiry and acknowledged in writing. Balance confirmations, e-mails admitting dues, and signed ledger statements can all qualify, if they acknowledge a subsisting liability.

The Supreme Court in Asset Reconstruction Co v Bishal Jaiswal (2021) held that entries in a company's balance sheet showing a debt can amount to acknowledgment in some circumstances. Before deciding that a claim is time-barred, look for such documents.

Laws that apply

How we work

We are a litigation and advisory practice led by Advocate BK Singh, with offices in Dwarka (New Delhi) and Vaishali (Ghaziabad). This is what you can expect:

• Deadline first: every new matter starts with a limitation check.
• Evidence of dates: receipt and service documented.
• Fast filing: urgent petitions prepared within days where needed.
• Honest advice: we tell you if a deadline has passed and what options remain.
• Written fee terms: agreed stage by stage, never linked to the outcome.

Deadline mistakes to avoid

Limitation in arbitration

Section 43 of the Arbitration Act applies the Limitation Act to arbitrations as it applies to court proceedings. For the purpose of limitation, an arbitration is deemed to have commenced on the date the respondent receives a request for the dispute to be referred to arbitration, under Section 21, unless the parties agreed otherwise. So the date that matters for a claim's limitation is not the date the tribunal is formed or the statement of claim is filed, but the date the notice invoking arbitration is received.

For most commercial claims, the period is three years from when the right to sue accrues, often the due date of payment. If you are close to three years, send a notice invoking arbitration at once, by a method that proves receipt, even if the statement of claim will take longer.

Limitation for Section 11 applications

Where a party applies to the court under Section 11 to appoint an arbitrator, two limitation questions arise: whether the Section 11 application itself is in time, and whether the underlying claims are in time. In Arif Azim v Aptech (2024), the Supreme Court held that a Section 11 application must be filed within three years from the date the cause of action for the application arises, usually when the other side fails to appoint after a notice, and that the court may refuse to refer claims that are plainly time-barred on the face of the record, while generally leaving limitation of claims to the tribunal.

After SBI General Insurance v Krish Spinning (2024), the referral court's role is limited, and most limitation disputes about claims are decided by the arbitrator. But a party should still act promptly on both fronts.

Section 29A time limits for the award

For domestic arbitrations, Section 29A requires the tribunal to make its award within 12 months from completion of pleadings, extendable by six months by consent of the parties, and further only by the court. Pleadings should themselves be completed within six months of the arbitrator receiving notice of appointment, under Section 23(4). If the mandate expires without an extension, the tribunal cannot proceed until the court extends it.

Track these dates from the start of the arbitration. Agree consent extensions in writing before the 12 months end, and apply to the court in time if more is needed. See arbitration time limit.

Cheque bounce timelines in detail

A cheque bounce case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act has three linked deadlines. First, the cheque must be presented within its validity, generally three months from its date. Second, after the bank returns it unpaid, the payee must send a written notice demanding payment within 30 days of receiving the bank's information. Third, if the drawer does not pay within 15 days of receiving the notice, the complaint must be filed within one month of the date the cause of action arises.

Missing any of these defeats the complaint, though the court may condone delay in filing the complaint for sufficient cause under the proviso to Section 142(1)(b). Keep the bank's return memo, proof of dispatch and delivery of the notice, and file early. See cheque bounce case.

SARFAESI and DRT timelines

For borrowers facing SARFAESI action, two deadlines are critical. The Section 13(2) notice gives 60 days to pay or object, and objections should be sent within that period so that the bank must respond under Section 13(3A). Once the bank takes a measure under Section 13(4), such as possession, the borrower can apply to the DRT under Section 17 within 45 days; the DRT can condone delay in some circumstances, but courts have been strict.

Appeals to the DRAT from DRT orders must be filed within 30 days, with the pre-deposit. Borrowers should act within these periods, since late applications are often dismissed. See DRT and debt recovery.

Getting help in time

When you contact a lawyer about a deadline, send the document that starts the clock (the award, order, notice or memo), evidence of when you received it, and any related documents, such as the contract, earlier correspondence and payment records. A lawyer can then confirm the deadline, check for exclusions or extensions, and prepare the filing. Do not wait until the last week; urgent filings are possible, but they leave no room for error.

Condonation of delay

Section 5 of the Limitation Act allows a court to admit an appeal or application after the period if the applicant shows sufficient cause for not filing in time. It does not apply to suits, and special laws can exclude it, as with Section 34 of the Arbitration Act beyond the extra 30 days. Courts look at whether the delay was explained day by day, whether the applicant acted in good faith and with diligence, and the length of the delay.

In commercial matters, courts have become stricter. In Borse Brothers (2021), the Supreme Court said condonation in commercial arbitration appeals should be the exception. Government bodies are not treated more leniently. Treat every deadline as fixed, and use condonation only as a last resort.

Limitation during the COVID period

For the period from 15 March 2020 to 28 February 2022, the Supreme Court, in its own-motion orders on extension of limitation, excluded that period for computing limitation, and gave a further period of 90 days from 1 March 2022 in some cases. This affects claims and applications whose limitation would otherwise have expired during or soon after that period. For most current disputes, the period is long past, but it can still matter for older claims and for disputes about whether earlier filings were in time.

Limitation and settlement talks

Negotiations do not stop limitation. A party that spends months in settlement discussions may find that its claim or its right to challenge has expired. Where talks are under way and a deadline approaches, file to protect your position, or obtain a written acknowledgment of liability from the other side before the period expires. In conciliation under Part III of the Arbitration Act, Section 77 allows a party to start proceedings during conciliation where necessary to preserve its rights.