Best Export or Import Deal Gone Wrong? International Trade Arbitration Lawyer

Indian exporters and importers trade with buyers and suppliers around the world, often on standard form contracts that choose foreign law and foreign arbitration. When a foreign buyer refuses to pay, rejects a shipment at the destination, or a supplier ships short or late, the Indian business may face a dispute in a forum thousands of kilometres away, under rules it has never read. Commodity traders face arbitration under the rules of trade associations such as GAFTA, FOSFA or the International Cotton Association, which can move quickly and issue binding awards.

This page is for Indian exporters, importers and commodity traders. In short: read the contract's governing law and arbitration clause, which may be in a standard form or the seller's terms; act within the short time limits that trade association rules often impose; use the letter of credit and the bank's role where payment was by LC; protect export realisation obligations under FEMA; and remember that foreign awards can be enforced in India, against you or for you, under the New York Convention.

A trade dispute ignored becomes an award. Respond to every notice from a foreign arbitral body, even if you believe it has no jurisdiction.

Is this your situation?

Common trade disputes

Where trade disputes are decided

International sale contracts usually specify the governing law, often English law for commodities, and an arbitration clause. Commodity trades use trade association rules: GAFTA for grain and feed, FOSFA for oils and fats, the International Cotton Association for cotton, and others for sugar, coffee and metals. These rules have their own tribunals, short time limits for claims, a two-tier system with an appeal board, and specialist arbitrators drawn from the trade.

Manufactured goods and other trade often use institutional rules such as SIAC, ICC or LCIA, with seats in Singapore, London or elsewhere, or an Indian institution such as IIAC or MCIA if the parties chose India. Some contracts are made through emails and proforma invoices with the seller's standard terms attached. Whether the arbitration clause in those terms binds the buyer depends on whether it was incorporated, which can itself be disputed.

How we handle trade disputes

Time and typical cost range

Our fees are agreed in writing at the start, stage by stage, and are not linked to the outcome.

Documents needed

Incoterms and who bears the risk

Letters of credit

A confirmed letter of credit gives the exporter strong payment security: the bank pays against compliant documents, independently of disputes about the goods. LCs are usually governed by the ICC's Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits (UCP 600). Banks examine documents strictly, and discrepancies such as a date error, a missing signature, or a description that does not match the LC can lead to refusal.

When an LC payment is refused, check whether the discrepancies cited are real under UCP 600 and the international standard banking practice, and whether the bank gave notice of refusal within five banking days as required. If the refusal was improper, the bank itself may be liable. Indian courts, like courts abroad, generally do not restrain payment under LCs except for fraud. For exporters, the lesson is to prepare documents meticulously and to check them against the LC before presentation.

Enforcing foreign awards in India

India is a party to the New York Convention, and awards made in notified Convention countries are enforced under Part II of the Arbitration Act. The award holder files an enforcement petition in the High Court with jurisdiction where the assets are, under the commercial division. The court may refuse enforcement only on the grounds in Section 48: incapacity, invalid agreement, lack of proper notice or inability to present one's case, award beyond the submission, irregular composition or procedure, award not yet binding or set aside, non-arbitrable subject matter, or conflict with the public policy of India in its narrow sense.

Indian courts have enforced many GAFTA and FOSFA awards against Indian traders, and have rejected challenges that sought to re-argue the merits. A party that did not participate abroad, believing the tribunal had no jurisdiction, may still face enforcement in India if the tribunal had jurisdiction under the contract. See foreign award enforcement.

Laws and rules that apply

How we work

We are a litigation and advisory practice led by Advocate BK Singh, with offices in Dwarka (New Delhi) and Vaishali (Ghaziabad), working with counsel in foreign seats. This is what you can expect:

• Rule awareness: trade association and institutional time limits tracked from day one.
• Documentary focus: shipping, inspection and LC documents analysed closely.
• FEMA protection: coordination with your bank on export realisation.
• Enforcement planning: awards enforced in India or resisted on proper grounds.
• Written fee terms: agreed stage by stage, never linked to the outcome.

Mistakes in trade disputes

Commodity contract defaults

In commodity trades, a common dispute is default: the seller fails to ship, or the buyer fails to open the LC or take delivery. Under trade association rules, the innocent party's damages are usually the difference between the contract price and the market price on the date of default, often fixed by the tribunal with reference to published prices or evidence from the trade. Rules such as GAFTA's default clause set out how the default date and the market price are determined.

Indian traders who default when prices move against them are often surprised by the size of the award. Conversely, Indian sellers who face buyers' defaults in a falling market can recover the difference. Keep records of market prices on the relevant dates, and give notices of default in the form the rules require.

Quality claims and inspection

Most quality disputes depend on inspection. Sale contracts often specify a pre-shipment inspection by an agreed surveyor, whose certificate may be final as to quality, or a destination inspection with a joint survey. If the contract makes the pre-shipment certificate final, the buyer's later complaints may be barred unless there was fraud or the inspection was not carried out properly.

Where a buyer rejects goods at destination, insist on a joint survey by an independent surveyor, with notice to you, before the goods are processed or resold. Samples should be drawn and sealed according to the contract or trade rules. A buyer who processes the goods before raising a complaint usually has great difficulty proving the defect.

Payment terms and their risks

Exporters choose between advance payment, letters of credit, documentary collection (documents against payment or documents against acceptance), and open account. Each carries different risk. Under documents against acceptance, the buyer gets the documents on accepting a bill of exchange and can take the goods before paying, which is where many disputes arise. Under open account, the exporter relies entirely on the buyer's credit.

For riskier buyers or markets, a confirmed LC, credit insurance from ECGC or a private insurer, or factoring can reduce the risk. When a dispute arises, the payment term decides the exporter's leverage: with an LC, the bank pays against documents; with documentary collection, the exporter may still control the goods; with open account, arbitration may be the only route.

Indian importers facing foreign suppliers

Indian importers face their own disputes: foreign suppliers who ship short, ship goods not matching the specification, delay shipment, or refuse to refund advances. The importer's options depend on the contract's governing law and arbitration clause. If the supplier is in China, Southeast Asia or Europe, the contract may choose arbitration in that region, such as CIETAC, HKIAC or SIAC.

Before paying the balance against documents, an importer can arrange pre-shipment inspection. After arrival, document defects with a survey report and photographs, and notify the supplier in writing within any period the contract requires. Where advances were paid, the claim for refund may be supported by the supplier's own correspondence admitting the shortfall.

Customs and regulatory issues in disputes

Disputes sometimes arise when goods are held at the port: for example, rejected by Indian customs for non-compliance with standards, labelling or licensing requirements, or not cleared by the importer. Demurrage and detention charges accumulate quickly. The contract's allocation of responsibility for import clearance, and the Incoterm, decide who bears these costs.

An exporter whose goods are abandoned at a foreign port by a buyer should act quickly to reduce losses: arrange re-export or local sale, and keep records of the steps taken. The duty to mitigate loss applies in most legal systems, and a tribunal will reduce damages if the claimant did not take reasonable steps.

Interim relief against foreign parties

If a foreign buyer or supplier has assets in India, such as goods in a warehouse, receivables from Indian customers, or a bank account, an Indian court can grant interim relief under Section 9 to preserve those assets for a foreign-seated arbitration, since the proviso to Section 2(2) applies Section 9 to international commercial arbitrations seated abroad unless the parties agree otherwise. The application must show a reasonable case, urgency and a real risk that the assets will be dissipated. Such orders can be decisive, because they secure the eventual award.

Making contracts that protect you

Many trade disputes could be avoided, or won more easily, with a better contract. For each new buyer or supplier, use a written contract that states the governing law, the arbitration rules and the seat, the Incoterm with the named place, the inspection regime and whether the inspection certificate is final, the payment term and security, a time limit for quality claims, and a limit on liability for consequential loss.

Where you have bargaining power, consider choosing an Indian seat, such as Delhi or Mumbai, with IIAC or MCIA rules, which keeps the proceedings closer to home and in a familiar legal system. Where a foreign seat is unavoidable, Singapore under SIAC rules is often a practical choice for Asian trade. Avoid contracts that say nothing about disputes, which leave you to litigate in the counterparty's courts. See arbitration clause drafting.

ECGC claims and buyer default

Exporters who hold an ECGC policy must follow its conditions when a buyer defaults: report overdue payments within the time stated, take steps to recover, and obtain ECGC's consent before settling for less or extending the payment period. A claim may be rejected if these conditions are not met. Where an arbitration is started against the buyer, keep ECGC informed, since it may share the recovery or cost of proceedings. Coordinating the arbitration with the insurance claim protects both recoveries.